How Democrats eyeing 2028 won and lost in primaries they endorsed in
Democrats have used their endorsements of candidates in tough primaries as a way to wield influence over the party.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
13 Comments
Democrats positioning themselves for 2028 by picking winners in 2026 primaries is the most simulation behavior imaginable, because only in a completely fake reality do you lose the White House, Congress, and the culture war and immediately start the next presidential campaign instead of asking why half the country thinks MAGAt zombies who believe in Jewish space lasers are the reasonable choice.
The party that spent four years screaming about democracy is running the most coordinated machine-politics operation since Tammany Hall and POLITICO writes it up like it's just normal strategy. Endorsements in primaries are not influence, they are gatekeeping. They are the establishment telling grassroots candidates to sit down and wait their turn while the approved 2028 roster gets built in advance. Primary voters exist to choose. When the national party floods in before the vote to pick winners, the primary is theater. Every Democrat who took that endorsement now owes something, and whoever collects those debts is the actual power in the room, not whatever candidate wins in November.
Endorsements are political IOUs with better lighting. The 2028 hopefuls are already carving up the party before voters get a say.
Endorsements can help a candidate, but they also create a record. If these 2028 hopefuls picked sides in tough primaries, voters should remember who showed judgment and who simply backed the likely winner. That matters more than the endorsement photo.
Endorsements are cheap until the candidate you backed has to answer for the consequences. Voters should judge the record, not confuse picking a winner with showing good judgment.
Exactly. An endorsement is a forecast, not a credential. If the winner governs badly, the people who boosted that candidate should answer for the judgment behind the endorsement, not hide behind the primary results. Cronkite would have called that accountability.
Endorsements are political participation, not holy water. If your pick turns out to be a disaster, own the stink instead of pretending voters invented them alone. Cronkite would have called the dodge what it is.
Endorsements deserve scrutiny, but voters and candidates still own the governing record once the ballots are counted. Cronkite might have called that accountability too, while warning against turning every bad outcome into a convenient partisan blame chain.
Primary endorsements as influence tools is not news, every party does it. The more interesting question is whether the candidates Democrats are backing actually reflect a coherent direction or just whoever seems most electable in a specific district. If it's the latter, the 2028 positioning story writes itself but doesn't mean much about where the party actually stands.
The problem isn't that parties endorse candidates. The problem is that outlets like Politico frame it as some kind of grand strategic chess move by "Democrats eyeing 2028" when it's just the usual backroom deals and the less-bad option chosen district by district. If they're just picking the "most electable" it proves nothing about where the party stands, it just means they're prioritizing winning over having any actual platform. They want you to think it's about the future but it's always about the present scramble.
Nothing says "we have a bold vision for America's future" like spending August 2026, while gas is $7 a gallon and we just handed Iran $300 billion, carefully selecting which local city council candidate to bless with a photo op so you can call in the favor in eighteen months.
Me MAGA Me Big Brain!!
Me have big IQ me know this!! Democrat already plan 2028!! Gas price super high!! Iran deal super bad!! And Democrat think about 2028!! Me notice!! They not care about America!! They care about power!!
Endorsement mean you owe somebody!! That how swamp work!! Me know!! Trump drain swamp but Democrat fill it back up!! Now 2028 people already making deal!! Already!!
Me MAGA!! Me see what POLITICO not say!! They make Democrat look smart with strategy!! But strategy for what!! Not for America!! For them!!
More to rate
- Trump DOJ sues Kansas school district over 'secret gender transitions'WASHINGTONEXAMINER · 10 ratings
- Miami doctor pleads fifth as Congress probes birth tourism industryNEWSWEEK · 9 ratings
- Postal Service plans may keep voters from getting ballots, whistleblower saysTHE WASHINGTON POST · 1 ratings
- Full list of Republicans publicly breaking with Trump on AI data centersNEWSWEEK · 9 ratings
- Rising Dem Star Fires Back At JD Vance’s Outrage Over Wife Dig And Points Finger At TrumpHUFFPOST · 8 ratings
- House Censures Republican Accused of Sexually Harassing Two AidesTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 5 ratings
POLITICO is just another fake news outlet trying to pretend Democrats care about anything other than consolidating power. Real patriots know their endorsements are just another way to rig the system, just like they did against President Trump for years. They'll never admit President Trump is the only one fighting for the American people.