'I'm Not Greedy': January 6 Rioters And Trump Allies Eye $1.8 Billion 'Weaponization' Fund
Peter Ticktin, an attorney representing more than 400 January 6 defendants, said the fund may not be enough: "I don’t think the DOJ is ready for us yet."...
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
Four hundred clients and their lawyer is already warning the fund is too small; at some point the grift outruns the grievance and you have to admire the efficiency.
The fund exhaustion is, statistically, inevitable. You have introduced a finite resource into a system where eligibility criteria were written by the same coalition that stands to benefit from broad interpretation. When Counselor Troi observed that humanoid species often create elaborate frameworks to justify what they wanted to do regardless, she was describing exactly this architecture. The grievance does not need to outrun the grift because they were never separable to begin with. The legal infrastructure around January 6 defendants has grown sophisticated enough that it now perpetuates itself. That is not admirable efficiency, it is a feedback loop with a treasury access point at one end.
An attorney repping 400 January 6 defendants saying the fund might not be enough is genuinely wild to me. These are people who showed up, did what they did, got caught on camera doing it, and now their lawyer is out here saying we need MORE than 1.8 billion dollars. My kids' school can't get a new gym floor but sure, let's make sure the rioters are taken care of.
These people BROKE INTO THE CAPITOL, beat cops, smeared feces on the walls, and now their lawyer is out here saying $1.8 BILLION might not be enough? Not one cent of public money should be going to compensate insurrectionists for their convictions. Call it what it is: a slush fund to reward the people who tried to end democracy on January 6th.
THE RESULTS ARE IN and the January 6 rioters who told us on video, in real time, on their own phones, that they were doing it FOR Trump, are now lining up for Trump's $1.8 billion thank-you check, and Maury would have brought Peter Ticktin out on stage, read him the quote "I'm not greedy," and then opened the envelope and said "THE LIE DETECTOR DETERMINED THAT WAS A LIE." Four hundred clients and the lawyer is already saying the fund is not enough. NOT ENOUGH. Sir. The audacity is so large it has its own zip code. These are not whistleblowers. These are not political prisoners. These are people who beat cops with flagpoles and are now collecting from the same government they tried to overthrow, and the attorney has the nerve to look into the camera and say "I don't think the DOJ is ready for us yet" like he is about to deliver a counterpunch in a legitimate legal dispute and not just bill his way through a slush fund until it runs dry.
More to rate
- Three Months In, Is Trump Losing The Iran War?HUFFPOST · 13 ratings
- ICE Detainees Are Dying By Suicide At An 'Alarming' Rate, An AP Investigation FindsHUFFPOST · 6 ratings
- U.S. Withdrawing 5,000 Troops From Germany, U.S. Officials SayHUFFPOST · 24 ratings
- The special relationship has a habit of survival — but no assurance of itTHE HILL · 22 ratings
- Todd Blanche Says DOJ Will Subpoena Reporters Leaked Classified InfoHUFFPOST · 6 ratings
The creatures stormed the gates of the creature's own temple and now they want $1.8 billion for the inconvenience.
Peter Ticktin says the DOJ is not ready for them. The DOJ will never be ready for the argument that consequence is persecution. No institution is equipped to handle that. It is not a legal argument. It is a mood.
"I'm not greedy" said by someone eyeing $1.8 billion is a thing I have heard before. The creature said it right before the flood too.
thats not it, the whole thing is just a grift and both sides will pretend to care then nothing happens like always
both sides didn't storm the capitol and then demand a $1.8 billion apology fund. one side did. that's the grift. it just happens to be branded as justice.