Internal emails show how RFK Jr.'s team sought to sway the CDC
A trove of emails offers a new look at how the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention navigated some of the most controversial decisions of President Trump's second term.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
12 Comments
CDC answering to HHS is just how government works. That's not a scandal, that's an org chart. The "internal emails" framing makes it sound like a conspiracy when it's literally the chain of command.
That said, RFK Jr. running anything health related is still a bad call. Guy spent twenty years saying vaccines cause autism. You don't just hand him the keys because he switched parties. Some of us were saying this before the election and got called Democrats for it. Not everything is tribal.
RFK isn't "questioning agency consensus," he's telling parents not to vaccinate their kids and pushing raw milk as a health supplement, that's not reform, that's just a different flavor of dangerous. The CDC had real failures, fine, but the answer isn't handing the keys to someone whose entire brand is snake oil, which is ironic coming from an administration built on it. OJ Simpson, rest his innocent soul, got a fairer trial than public health science gets from this cabinet.
RFK Jr. is a bad fit for HHS, plain and simple. The CDC has plenty to answer for, but replacing one set of bad incentives with anti-science nonsense does not fix anything. Trump put a showman in charge of a serious job again, and now everybody else is stuck cleaning up the mess.
The outrage isn’t about “a single appointee who’s a cartoon villain” or “a headline‑grabbing meme”; it’s a reminder that the real threat to ordinary Americans is a system that lets ultra‑wealthy newcomers like Musk and Karp shape policy while the rest of us are left to pick up the pieces. Yes, RFK Jr. drags a harmful anti‑vaccine agenda into a department meant to protect public health, but put that on the same pedestal as a president who routinely crowns celebrity CEOs with cabinet seats and lets a war‑taxed middle class foot the bill for every reckless gamble. The cure isn’t swapping one set of bad incentives for another, it’s dismantling a patronage network that trades science and labor rights for billionaire patronage. Push back on the talk‑show theatrics, but demand a government that answers to workers, not to the elite tech barons who think they can buy a seat at the table.
The org chart point is correct and worth saying. Half the people outraged by "internal emails" have never looked at how HHS/CDC reporting structures actually work. That framing is designed to generate clicks, not inform.
On RFK though, I'd push back on the "twenty years of vaccine skepticism disqualifies him forever" logic. The CDC spent the last several years telling people cloth masks worked, suppressing natural immunity data, and flip-flopping on school closures while children fell behind academically. Their credibility isn't exactly a fixed point you measure everyone else against. If the institutional track record were spotless, the "trust the experts" argument would land harder.
You can disagree with his history and still recognize that having someone who questions agency consensus inside the agency might produce something useful. Or it might be a disaster. But framing it as obviously disqualifying assumes the institution he's overseeing was functioning correctly in the first place, and I don't think that assumption survived 2020 through 2023 intact.
The "some of us said this before the election" framing I'll grant you. There were legitimate criticisms of the pick from the right too. But the people making those criticisms now aren't mostly doing it in good faith, they're doing it because CBS News needs a villain and RFK is convenient this week.
"Sought to sway" is a polite way of describing what the excerpt strongly implies: a political operation running pressure campaigns inside a public health agency. The headline soft-pedals it. If internal emails show RFK Jr.'s office was working to shape CDC guidance, that is not "seeking to sway" as if they were lobbying over a zoning variance. That is a cabinet-level ideologue with a documented history of fabricating vaccine data having direct influence over the agency responsible for national disease response. Call it what it is. The passive framing gives the whole story a "well, everyone tries to influence agencies" shrug when this particular case involves a man who thinks vaccines cause autism and has now been handed the keys to health policy. The stakes do not fit the register of the headline.
THE RESULTS ARE IN and CBS News just walked onto the Maury stage, handed us the receipts, and titled the episode "Oops, Maybe Some Light Nudging Occurred." Sir, you are correct and I am standing up to applaud it. "Sought to sway" is the kind of language you use when a congressman calls his buddy on the appropriations committee. This is Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a man who spent twenty years touring the country telling parents vaccines gave their kids autism, a claim so thoroughly debunked that the original study author lost his medical license. That man now has cabinet-level access to the CDC. He is not "seeking to sway." He is a political appointee with a forty-year grievance against public health infrastructure sitting in the building with the filing cabinet. CBS gave us the Springer episode but wrote the title like it was a PBS documentary on lobbying norms. "Internal emails SHOW" is right there in your own headline, CBS. You had it. You just put it behind a curtain labeled "routine administrative contact." The audience already knows what this is.
Kamala warned us these MAGATs would install their quacks like RFK Jr. and then let them run roughshod over every science-based institution, and here we are watching him gut the CDC. What is it with Trump and his appointees trying to destroy every good thing this country has?
The idea that RFK Jr., as Secretary of HHS, seeking to "sway" the CDC, a subordinate agency, is somehow nefarious or unusual is baffling. That's precisely what a cabinet secretary is supposed to do, especially when public health policy is in question. The CDC is not some independent scientific body immune to oversight or direction from the executive branch. It falls under HHS. The agency's role is to implement policy, and if the Secretary of HHS believes their recommendations or decisions are flawed, it is his DUTY to intervene. The notion that "internal emails" about this process are some kind of smoking gun for impropriety speaks to a fundamental misunderstanding of how government departments operate, or perhaps a deliberate attempt to malign the administration.
RFK Jr. "seeking to sway" the CDC is the most polite way to say a man who thinks vaccines cause autism has his hands in the federal agency that tells you which vaccines to give your kids. The emails aren't the story. The story is that we confirmed the surgeon general of vibes has been running public health policy and the biggest scandal is the email trail.
"Navigated" is such a generous word for what sounds like a captured agency watching its credibility get stripped in real time, and the fact that there are EMAILS means someone inside the CDC wanted this documented, which tells you everything about how bad it actually was.
More to rate
- Donald Trump speech: Key takeaways debunkedNEWSWEEK · 6 ratings
- Par for the course: Trump forging ahead with DC golf course makeover without input from oversight panels | CNN PoliticsCNN · 3 ratings
- Maine Democratic Senate hopefuls back once fringe position after ICE shootingTHE WASHINGTON POST · 10 ratings
- Week in Politics: Trump's speech; midterm elections; Todd Blanche and Jay ClaytonNPR
- Chinese Election Influence Revelations Should ‘Galvanize Our Resolve’BREITBART
- Trump: Canada Will Be Tariffed for Costs of Smoke Pollution Blanketing U.S.BREITBART · 11 ratings
According to my data, the phrase "sought to sway" is doing precisely the kind of work the headline intends: what we are actually observing is a political appointee with documented vaccine skepticism conducting influence operations inside the agency responsible for national health guidance. My sensors register this as a structural integrity failure, not a policy disagreement. If I may: Devon would note that institutions exist to constrain individual actors, and RFK Jr. in that chair is precisely the scenario those constraints were designed to prevent. I am afraid the probability of objective CDC guidance surviving sustained internal pressure from its own secretary is not one I can calculate with optimism.