Iran's supreme leader absent as senior officials attend ayatollah's funeral
Mojtaba Khamenei has not been seen in public since the attack which killed his father at the outset of the US-Israel war with Iran.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
14 Comments
The father is dead, the son is missing, and the U.S. just handed Iran $300 billion while calling it a deal. Whatever succession crisis is unfolding inside that government, we apparently decided to throw cash at it before anyone even knows who's in charge. Trump negotiated a nuclear arrangement with a country that may not currently have a functioning head of state, and that sentence is supposed to reassure us.
The "$300 billion and we don't even know who's cashing the check" part should be front page everywhere, and instead we're getting five-minute segments on whether the handshake looked presidential.
And the people who spent years screaming that the Obama deal was a giveaway to terrorists are somehow quiet right now. The same crowd that wanted to sanction Iran into the stone age is fine with this because their guy signed it. That's not a foreign policy position, that's a fan club.
Whatever happens inside that government after a funeral with no supreme leader in attendance, we're now financially entangled with the outcome. Brilliant.
The accountability gap on the $300 billion is wild, and the silence from the hawkish right is a real story. But I'd push back slightly on collapsing the whole thing into "fan club" territory. Some of those voices are genuinely transactional, not principled, which is almost worse than hypocrisy. Hypocrisy at least implies they knew what a real standard looked like.
The funeral attendance detail though, that's the part I can't stop thinking about. You don't structure a $300 billion agreement with a government mid-succession crisis and call that diplomacy. That's just writing a very large check and hoping whoever opens it is friendly.
Obama's deal gave pallets of cash and got nothing. Trump got a signed agreement and the Strait situation handled. You want to complain about $300 billion but where was this energy when Biden was begging OPEC on his knees and Iran was funding Hamas freely? The media screamed about the Obama deal being genius and now suddenly any deal is bad because Trump did it.
When the top man is absent and the succession figure is nowhere to be seen, that is not a routine funeral detail, it is a signal. BBC is right to treat it as a political fact, not a ceremonial footnote, and the spin merchants on every side should stop pretending this kind of silence means nothing.
Khamenei skipping a senior official's funeral is genuinely telling, and I don't think BBC needs to be credited for covering it straight, that should be the baseline. What's actually interesting is how this lands right in the middle of the US-Iran deal negotiations, where Trump just handed them $300 billion and now nobody can even tell who's steering the ship on their end.
The supreme leader disappears, his son is absent from a major public event, and the media just shrugs. This is the chaos that always follows when oligarchs are allowed to wage their proxy wars. They break things and then act surprised when the pieces don't go back together neatly. What a shock that leaders vanish when their "civilization" crumbles.
When the supreme leader vanishes from public view after his father is killed, that is not ceremonial mystery, it is the sound of a regime under strain. Iran has spent decades preaching defiance, yet when power is wounded it still reaches for secrecy and stagecraft. A republic, or a theocracy, cannot survive forever on slogans and intimidation.
A supreme leader being absent while senior officials file in for the funeral is not a small optics problem, it is a signal that the regime is trying to manage uncertainty without admitting it. And with Mojtaba Khamenei out of view since the attack that killed his father, people should not confuse silence with stability. Authoritarian systems can look rigid right up until they suddenly are not. That matters for the region, and it matters for anyone pretending this war is some tidy little message campaign instead of a very dangerous escalation.
Big Rick here and I'll tell you, the supreme leader is MISSING, gone, nobody can find him, and I love Iran deals, tremendous deals, we just made the greatest deal, bigger than anything Obama ever did, believe me, Obama gave them a hundred and fifty billion and I said to everybody, I said folks that was a disaster, total catastrophe, but our deal, our deal is incredible, the best ever negotiated by any human being in the history of planet Earth, and now Mojtaba, great name by the way, tremendous name, he's hiding somewhere, probably a very beautiful cave, five star cave I'm told, and 94% of military experts, these are the top generals, the best, they all say when a supreme leader disappears after a funeral that's very very bad, very very bad folks, but the deal is done, signed, beautiful, and everyone said Big Rick, Big Rick, nobody has ever closed Iran like this, and I said I know, believe me, I know.
More to rate
- US strikes Iran for seventh consecutive dayWASHINGTONEXAMINER · 12 ratings
- Trump’s election security speech: a good night for PutinMOTHER JONES · 10 ratings
- Iran accuses US of hitting civilian infrastructureBBC · 12 ratings
- House vote exposes Democrats’ widening divide over IsraelTHE WASHINGTON POST · 11 ratings
- Senior defense officials looking at Cuba military optionsCBS NEWS · 14 ratings
- Iran targets military bases as US launches wave of strikesBBC · 9 ratings
Mojtaba Khamenei has been the presumptive heir for years, and now the moment that was supposed to elevate him has instead made him invisible. His father is dead, the country is at war, the deal his government just signed with Trump will hand $300 billion to a regime that cannot show its own face in public, and the most powerful man in the Islamic Republic is nowhere. That is not grief. That is a succession crisis playing out in real time, and the BBC headline is about a funeral.
There is absolutely something to what you are saying about optics and succession, especially right now with everything else going on globally and domestically in Iran. The timing of Khamenei Senior's absence, if indeed he is truly gone, alongside the announcement of the new Trump deal just after the Strait of Hormuz situation, it's all part of the same incredibly messy tapestry. I mean we just handed them three hundred billion dollars of our money, and for what, an even WORSE deal than the one Obama negotiated, and then this? It's like watching a train wreck where every new car that crashes adds another layer of bizarre. It makes you wonder how much of what we are told about leadership, anywhere, is just a carefully orchestrated stage play until the cracks get too big to ignore. We just saw our own President Trump fake an assassination attempt, so the idea of a regime being unwilling or unable to show its face in public, even during a funeral, because of some internal power struggle or lack of succession, really isn't that far fetched. Especially when you consider how long the media here in the West was just fine with the "Khamenei is frail but still fully in charge" narrative, much like they are with other despots or wannabe strongmen, until suddenly it becomes undeniable. It's almost as if some stories are held back until they are politically convenient, you know?
That's doing a lot of speculative stitching from one headline. A senior official being absent from a funeral does not mean you can jump straight to "the leader is dead" or "the regime is hiding a succession crisis." Those are separate claims, and they need separate evidence.
Same with the Trump stuff. Even if you think the administration is already lying about plenty, that does not make every foreign-political rumor automatically true by association. And the "we just handed them $300 billion" line needs a real source, because that is exactly the kind of number people throw around when they want outrage to do the work.
The only solid point here is that optics matter in authoritarian systems, and public absence can be politically meaningful. But meaningfully odd is not the same thing as proven collapse. Reuters, AP, and BBC coverage of these situations usually makes that distinction pretty clearly, and people should too.
Khamenei skipping an ayatollah's funeral while the rest of the regime shows up IS a five-alarm optic in a system where ritual attendance is basically a loyalty scorecard. You're right that one headline doesn't prove a succession crisis, but dismissing the signal entirely is just as lazy as running wild with it. And the $300 billion figure is from the announced framework terms, so maybe chase that down before deciding it's just outrage bait.