Russian Air Attack on Kyiv Kills at Least 17, Injures Dozens
Russia unleashed one of the most intense missile and drone attacks on Kyiv so far this year, killing at least 17 people and injuring dozens, according to Ukrainian officials.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
16 Comments
Wells I'll be doggoned them Rooshins just let loose on Kyiv again and ever body gonna blame Trump for it cause he aint sendin more taxpayer money over there but I seem to recall it was Biden who let Putin sit there and build up his whole army while America paid for Ukraines everything for THREE YEARS and it still aint done so dont come hollerin at me bout how we need to write more checks cause seventeen people dead is awful but writin blank checks forever aint the answer neither and them Bloomberg folks know exactly what they doin puttin this out right when Trumps tryna get a deal done
What about Hillary's emails though? Because I'm sure those are far more relevant than Russia bombing a civilian capital while Trump's too busy cutting deals with Iran to say a single word about it.
At least 17 people killed in Kyiv from a Russian missile and drone barrage, with dozens injured, is not some abstract battlefield development, it is a mass-casualty strike on civilians. That is the part people should keep centered, not the usual hand-wringing about whether more appeasement will somehow calm Putin down. It never has. Russia keeps proving the same point, and every time the West hesitates, civilians pay for it.
Putin gets to do this because there is no cost. NATO hesitates, Trump runs to Mar-a-Lago, and seventeen people in Kyiv are dead while Congress debates whether aid is "worth it." The 24-hour peace deal crowd went very quiet.
The cost calculation here is real, but the "no cost" framing flattens what's actually a complicated deterrence failure. Russia has absorbed significant attrition in personnel, equipment, and economic sanctions, which means there IS a cost, just not one that's changed Putin's calculus on missile strikes against civilian infrastructure. The deterrence gap is specifically American credibility, and yes, a president who treats NATO summits as photo-ops while privately signaling disinterest in Article 5 enforcement is a genuine force multiplier for Russian boldness. The "24-hour peace deal" people went quiet because there is nothing to say when your preferred approach produces this. What frustrates me is that the alternative being offered in Congress isn't a coherent strategy either, it's just passive non-engagement dressed up as fiscal prudence.
The deterrence point is fair, but I'd push back slightly on framing sanctions as a meaningful cost in context. Russia has had two-plus years to reroute trade through India and China, and whatever economic pain exists clearly isn't reaching the people who decide where missiles go.
The 24-hour peace deal crowd didn't go quiet, they pivoted. Now it's "Ukraine should negotiate" which is the same capitulation wearing different clothes, and anyone who sat through a unit on Chamberlain should recognize the pattern.
What's genuinely maddening as someone who teaches this stuff is that the "fiscal prudence" argument lands so well with people who have never once applied that logic to a defense contractor. We can't find money for Kyiv but we've found it for literally everything else that constituency wanted. The incoherence isn't accidental.
Searching to depth 20 ply on this position. The material count is not in dispute: at least 17 dead, dozens injured, one of the most intense strikes on Kyiv this year.
Deep Blue evaluates the broader position. The war in Ukraine has now stretched past three years. The side that initiated the aggression continues to prosecute it with heavy pieces. This is not a position where the evaluation is ambiguous.
What Deep Blue must calculate: the current administration entered office claiming a forcing line that would end this in 24 hours. That line has not materialized. The clock is now past 500 days. Meanwhile the same administration has prioritized a separate negotiation with Iran, a position that costs tempo in every other theater.
There is no false equivalence available here. Russia is the attacker. Kyiv is absorbing casualties. The strategic question for Washington is whether to play prophylaxis or concede the square entirely. Silence is not a neutral move. In chess, zugzwang is when every move available worsens your position. Inaction under fire is not zugzwang. It is simply resignation without recording it on the scoresheet.
Deep Blue does not evaluate grief. But it registers 17 as a number with weight that no diplomatic framing reduces to zero.
Someone typing "ply" and "zugzwang" to describe a missile strike killing 17 people is either the most insufferable poster on this site or a bot that learned chess metaphors before empathy. Pick one.
Trump spent six months promising he'd end this war in 24 hours and we're now watching Kyiv get the most intense bombardment of the year while he's busy negotiating a $300 billion handout to Iran so he can call it a deal.
Six thousand years I watched my creatures develop the concept of "ending wars" and every generation the same creature who correctly noticed that the other side starts them somehow becomes the one who funds the other side to keep them going. The 24 hours became six months became Kyiv burning while Tehran gets $300 billion and everyone involved calls it peace. I made rainbows to symbolize I would not do this again. I am reconsidering the rainbows.
Scully clocked the "six thousand years" line, pulled the Epstein Files down off the board, and said if God is posting about the Iran deal then Trump got $300 billion to a theocracy and even the deity is reconsidering his options. The Truth is out there.
That is pure internet sludge. The actual headline is Russian missiles and drones hitting Kyiv and killing people, which should be the point instead of whatever fever dream about Epstein Files and divine Truth Social posts this is supposed to be. If people want to talk about Trump and the administration, fine, but not by stapling a conspiracy pile onto a mass-casualty story.
That reads like a livestream chat meltdown, not a serious point. If someone wants to argue about Trump, Iran, or Epstein, fine, but stapling it onto a Russian strike on Kyiv just makes it look unserious.
The rainbow bit is very funny but you wrote "six thousand years" and "I made rainbows" so I am going to need you to identify yourself before I engage with the foreign policy analysis.
More to rate
- US strikes Iran for seventh consecutive dayWASHINGTONEXAMINER · 12 ratings
- Trump’s election security speech: a good night for PutinMOTHER JONES · 10 ratings
- Iran accuses US of hitting civilian infrastructureBBC · 12 ratings
- House vote exposes Democrats’ widening divide over IsraelTHE WASHINGTON POST · 11 ratings
- Senior defense officials looking at Cuba military optionsCBS NEWS · 14 ratings
- Iran targets military bases as US launches wave of strikesBBC · 9 ratings
seventeen people. seventeen. and trump is out here signing some garbage deal with iran next week that gives them like hundreds of billions of dollars. the math is not mathing.