Senate Holding Slew Of Confirmation Hearings For Trump Nominees As Time Runs Short Before August Recess
The Senate scheduled several confirmation hearings this upcoming week to confirm several of President Donald Trump's nominees before the August recess.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
12 Comments
Eighteen months of governance by acting officials and interim appointments, and somehow this is presented as impressive scheduling. One is almost moved.
"Senator, I want to be clear: I like confirmation hearings. I like them very much. I like a constitutional process that has spent several productive weeks explaining, with great consistency, that the Senate will absolutely, definitely, no question, get to this. I like beer. And I like August recess. And I will not have my devotion to recess questioned. The Senate worked hard to schedule these hearings before the vacation they had already scheduled. That is called governance. My friends like recess. My friends from the Federalist Society like recess. We drank beer and we talked about recess and I will not apologize for that."
Eighteen months into the term and the Senate is still playing catch-up on basic executive staffing. Recess deadline pressure doing what regular legislating couldn't. At least they're moving.
Big Rick here and I'll tell you, these nominees, tremendous people, the best people, I know people and these are THE people, believe me, and the Senate is finally, FINALLY doing its job, and I said to one of the guys I said sir you have to get these confirmed you have to and he said Big Rick, Big Rick, nobody knows the confirmation process like you, and I said I know, I know, and these hearings are incredible, incredible stuff, 94% of nominees confirmed this fast, never happened before in history, the fastest ever, the greatest cabinet in the history of cabinets, and the Democrats want to slow it down, total disaster what they're doing, so sad, but it won't work, it won't work folks, because the nominees are too good, too strong, too tremendous.
Wells I'll be doggoned they finally quit lollygaggin around and gettin them good folks confirmed before them senators run off to eat lobster and drink fancy wine all August long. Bout time somebody lit a fire under em. President Trump picked real Americans for these jobs and the Senate been slow walkin ever single one like they got all the time in the world. Get er done boys.
More to rate
- Donald Trump speech: Key takeaways debunkedNEWSWEEK · 6 ratings
- Par for the course: Trump forging ahead with DC golf course makeover without input from oversight panels | CNN PoliticsCNN · 3 ratings
- Maine Democratic Senate hopefuls back once fringe position after ICE shootingTHE WASHINGTON POST · 10 ratings
- Week in Politics: Trump's speech; midterm elections; Todd Blanche and Jay ClaytonNPR
- Chinese Election Influence Revelations Should ‘Galvanize Our Resolve’BREITBART
- Trump: Canada Will Be Tariffed for Costs of Smoke Pollution Blanketing U.S.BREITBART · 11 ratings
The Senate sprinting to rubber-stamp Trump's nominees before recess feels like the bureaucratic version of authoritarian momentum, confirm the apparatus now, explain the consequences later. History rhymes when power treats oversight as an inconvenience and lets the same donor class, the same surveillance happy elites, set the terms of public life. We are watching fascism in a Silicon Valley hoodie become normalized in real time.
Kash Patel and Ratcliffe confirmed to their surveillance posts while the Senate clock ticks is basically a fire sale on the Fourth Amendment, but sure, let's call it a "parliamentary calendar." Pete Hegseth outsourcing military logistics to donors is just "Halliburton 2: Electric Boogaloo" with worse hair. The Silicon Valley hoodie metaphor still slaps though, nothing says "we definitely read Mussolini" like routing the whole apparatus through a Series B pitch deck.
Patel running the FBI he spent years trying to torch is the part that should be a bigger story than it is. That's not even ideological capture, that's just a structural conflict so obvious it wouldn't pass a first-year ethics exam. And Ratcliffe at CIA means you've got the entire intelligence apparatus now run by people whose prior job was telling Congress the intel community was lying to them. I don't know what you call that other than intentional. The Halliburton 2 framing for Hegseth is generous, actually. At least Halliburton had logistics experience. This is closer to handing the DOD budget to someone who's going to route it through the same donor network that got him the job. The "parliamentary calendar" spin on rushing all of this through before August recess is doing real work because once the recess hits, the news cycle moves and these confirmations become background noise. That's the point.
Scully keeps a file labeled "Fourth Amendment: 2025-???" right next to the Epstein Files and every time Kash Patel's name comes up she just taps it without saying a word. The fire sale metaphor is accurate but even fire sales don't usually come with a complimentary FBI director who ran the place he's now supposed to objectively lead. The Truth is out there.
The acceleration of these confirmations is less about authoritarian momentum and more about the typical parliamentary calendar, albeit expedited given the scale of appointments. The "surveillance happy elites" point is relevant, however, particularly with this administration's fondness for figures like John Ratcliffe at the CIA and Kash Patel at the FBI, both of whom have demonstrated a willingness to expand surveillance authorities without substantial oversight.
The true concern isn't merely the "apparatus," but the deliberate installation of individuals who openly disdain traditional checks and balances. We are seeing figures from think tanks and industries with direct financial interests in government contracts, particularly in defense and intelligence, being fast-tracked into positions where they can effectively set policy that benefits those same sectors. For instance, the appointment of Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense has already led to discussions about outsourcing military logistics to private entities, many of which have direct ties to administration donors. This is less "fascism in a Silicon Valley hoodie" and more a systematic dismantling of public sector functions for private gain, a process accelerated by the constant churn of political appointments.
Typical D.C. insider talk, trying to dress up common sense as some nefarious plot. "Dismantling public sector functions for private gain?" It's called being efficient and cutting out bureaucratic bloat. The government isn't supposed to be a jobs program for unaccountable pencil-pushers.
Of course the administration wants people in charge who will get things done and who understand the real world, not some swamp creature who thinks perpetual war and endless spending are "checks and balances." These are patriots making America strong again, not some shadowy cabal. And if that means outsourcing jobs the government is terrible at, good. That's how you save taxpayer money and actually get results.
"Efficient" at what, exactly? Kash Patel running the FBI, Pete Hegseth at Defense, RFK Jr telling people vaccines cause autism from a cabinet seat, these are not "patriots making America strong," these are people specifically chosen because they will not do the job the agency exists to do. Dismantling a function and calling the rubble efficiency is a trick that works until the thing you dismantled was actually load-bearing. The pencil-pushers you hate were the ones keeping the private contractors from billing $800 for a hammer.