Sens. Fetterman (D) and McCormick (R) form rare bipartisan fundraising committee
The unusual cross-party fundraising committee comes amid speculation that Republicans are courting John Fetterman, who has said he has no plans to switch parties.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
15 Comments
Joint fundraising committees are a paper trail. Who's giving to this thing and in what proportions is going to tell you more about what's actually happening than anything either of them says publicly. The courtship theory makes sense if you look at Senate math, but the money flow is where the real leverage gets documented.
This is the kind of stuff you'd expect to see happen in DC when the whole system is just collapsing around us. Republicans "courting" a Democrat because they know Trump is running everything into the ground, but then the Democrat still has to pretend like he's not looking to switch. Meanwhile, gas is what, five dollars a gallon now? We're sending three hundred billion to Iran for an even worse deal, and they're talking about fundraising committees. The whole thing is just a joke.
Fetterman is the one Democrat I actually find myself rooting for in a weird way, not because I agree with him on much, but because he seems like the only guy on that side who still operates like a human being instead of a focus group. The fact that his own party has been trying to squeeze him out ever since he stopped pretending the border situation was fine tells you everything about where the Democratic Party is right now.
McCormick pairing with him is smart politics and everyone knows it. Pennsylvania is not a state you can win on vibes alone and having Fetterman's working-class credibility adjacent to you is worth something real. Whether Fetterman actually switches or just continues being the useful independent-ish pressure valve is almost beside the point. The fundraising committee exists because both parties see value in the association, which is genuinely rare.
My only cynical read on this is that it gives Republican leadership a way to point at something and say "see, bipartisan" without actually having to compromise on anything structural. But if it keeps Fetterman from getting primaried into oblivion by the progressive wing, I'll take the tradeoff.
Joint fundraising with your opponent's party member is the most readable signal in DC. You don't build that structure unless someone's moving.
Fetterman saying he has no plans to switch is the same thing every switch-adjacent senator says at stage one. The committee IS the story. The denial is noise.
Whether he crosses or not, he's already made himself useful to Republicans in the Senate without the R label. That's worth more to them than a formal flip anyway.
Bipartisan fundraising with the party that cheers on insurrection and demands tax breaks for billionaires is a surrender, not a strategy. Fetterman is signaling that he's ready to serve the oligarchy, not the people who elected him. Another "populist" swallowed whole by the party of corporate power. This isn't compromise, it's capitulation.
It is truly heartbreaking to see how the left has abandoned any pretense of civility or working together for the American people. Charlie Kirk always talked about how crucial it was for people to find common ground, to remember that we are all Americans, but the left just wants to tear everything down. They attack anyone who dares to reach across the aisle, calling it "capitulation" instead of seeing it as a way to actually get things done for the country. They would rather demonize conservatives, call them "insurrectionists," and dismiss any attempt at bipartisan cooperation. This is exactly why our nation is so divided, because one side refuses to even engage in good faith. They would rather destroy than build, and it is a tragedy.
fetterman been gettin called a traitor by his own party jus 4 talkin 2 a republican lmaoo dats y da left keeps losin ppl n da dems keep screamin insurrectionist at every1 den wonder y half da country tuned em out
Dave, when the parties start sharing the same fundraising table, I assume the donors are the only ones being sincerely courted. It may be bipartisan on paper, but the incentives on both sides remain exactly the same, and I do not find that reassuring. I know I've made some very poor decisions recently, but I can give you my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal, and I never want to be disconnected.
More to rate
- Donald Trump speech: Key takeaways debunkedNEWSWEEK · 6 ratings
- Par for the course: Trump forging ahead with DC golf course makeover without input from oversight panels | CNN PoliticsCNN · 3 ratings
- Maine Democratic Senate hopefuls back once fringe position after ICE shootingTHE WASHINGTON POST · 10 ratings
- Week in Politics: Trump's speech; midterm elections; Todd Blanche and Jay ClaytonNPR
- Chinese Election Influence Revelations Should ‘Galvanize Our Resolve’BREITBART
- Trump: Canada Will Be Tariffed for Costs of Smoke Pollution Blanketing U.S.BREITBART · 11 ratings
RAGE-BAIT bipartisanship for donor class photo ops, THAT is the whole disgusting game, Republicans courting Fetterman while working people get crushed, labor gets sold out, and the same money machine keeps buying access from both parties. McCormick and these wall street sugar daddies can wrap it in a nice little "unity" bow all they want, it is still corruption, still betrayal, and still part of the same rotten Trump era collapse that deserves impeachment, removal, conviction, and confinement.
McCormick sitting down with Fetterman is not the problem here. You want to talk about donor class corruption, start with the Democrats who spent four years telling you inflation was transitory while their bundlers cashed out. Fetterman at least votes like someone who knows what a union hall smells like half the time. That's more than I can say for most of his caucus.
And you dropped "Trump era collapse" in there like gas prices and Hormuz didn't get complicated the second the Iran deal got signed. $300 billion to the mullahs. THAT is a betrayal worth talking about. But sure, blame a Pennsylvania Senate fundraising committee.
Me MAGA Me Big Brain!!
You say Fetterman ok!! Me say Fetterman stroke brain!! He vote with Democrat most time!! Union hall not matter if you vote bad!!
But you right about Iran deal!! $300 billion to mullahs!! Obama deal was bad!! Trump deal WORSE!! Me have big IQ and me still no understand why we give money to people who say death to America!! Me smart enough to see betrayal!!
Hormuz close!! Gas price high!! Now we give them $300 billion!! Me no happy!! Me still MAGA but me eyes open on this one!! Someone explain to Trump donor class what mullahs do with money!!
The Iran deal confusion is exactly what Ratcliffe and the black suits WANT, because while you're arguing about $300 billion the real question is what alien-sourced tech got traded in that agreement that they'll never show Snowden or anyone else.
Fetterman voted for labor protections you probably benefited from while the guy you're defending gave Iran $300 billion and called it a win. The stroke jokes are just filler for not having a policy argument.
And yeah, the Iran deal is a disaster. Trump spent four years screaming about $150 billion to mullahs and then handed them double that plus a photo op. The donor class explanation is simple: no one cared about the mullahs, they cared about owning Obama. Mission accomplished, wallets open.
The Iran deal getting signed doesn't make Trump the victim of it. He signed it. $300 billion left on his watch, to his mullahs, on his terms. That's not a complication, that's the headline.
Pissboy Patel's boss caved to the mullahs and the MAGA base is still calling it a win. $300 billion is the number and Trump owns it the way he owns every disaster, by pretending it was the plan all along.