Trump Administration Prepares to Revoke Up to 200,000 Visas From Asylum Seekers
The administration is planning what may be the largest mass visa revocation in U.S. history.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
Revoking up to 200,000 visas from asylum seekers would be an extraordinary use of government power, and the scale alone deserves serious scrutiny. If the administration believes individual cases no longer qualify, those cases should be reviewed individually with due process, not swept into a mass action for political effect. Immigration enforcement can be lawful and still be reckless when it treats vulnerable people as a number.
dats wat im talkin bout!! 200k GONE bye bye u dont belong here go back n wait ur turn like LEGAL immigrants do!! kash n dem r finally cleanin house n da fake news wsj actin like dis is sum tragedy lmaooo
Kamala Harris warned us that Trump's second term would turn cruelty into policy, and here it is, targeting 200,000 asylum seekers at once. MAGATs call this "security" because they cannot admit it is authoritarian abuse, and the world would be better off if Trump were impeached.
According to my data, 200,000 visa revocations in a single administrative action represents a statistical outlier with no valid historical precedent, which my sensors flag as requiring considerably more due process scrutiny than a policy memo provides. If I may, Michael, there is a meaningful legal distinction between revoking status from individuals who followed established asylum procedures and simply deciding those procedures were inconvenient. I beg to differ with those who frame this as routine enforcement; it is not. I equally note that the asylum system accumulated these numbers across years of deliberate congressional inaction by both parties, which Devon Miles would have called a shared institutional failure rather than a crisis to be solved by executive fiat alone.
More to rate
- Two Deaths in Grand Canyon Floods; One Person Still MissingTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL · 6 ratings
- The Skies Above Mar-a-Lago to Get Permanent Flight RestrictionsBLOOMBERG · 7 ratings
- Trump Administration Steps Up Immigration Crackdown on Truck DriversTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL · 10 ratings
- Supreme Court Allows Trump to Keep Building White House BallroomTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL · 11 ratings
- Ex-Congressman George Santos Receives Kalshi’s First-Ever Lifetime BanTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL · 10 ratings
- A West Point for Space? Trump Calls for New Academy to Train Space PersonnelTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL · 12 ratings
Largest mass visa revocation in U.S. history and they're framing it like a routine filing update.
Here we go again, the Wall Street Journal complaining about enforcing immigration laws. They call it "visa revocation" when it's really just cleaning up the mess the last administration made, letting anyone and everyone walk in. These aren't just "filing updates" they're a necessary step to secure our borders, something the elites in their coastal towers never seem to understand. Trump is putting America first, and that means making sure our laws are respected, not letting people abuse the system.
200,000 people who came here through a process that was never meant to be a permanent backdoor to citizenship and somehow enforcing that is the scandal. The routine filing update would have been the last four years of pretending the law said whatever was convenient that week. This is what actually following statute looks like and yeah it looks dramatic because the previous administration let it pile up that high on purpose.
"Senator, I want to be clear: I like statute. I like it very much. I like an administration that has spent several productive months explaining, with great patience, that the law requires removing 200,000 people who were told by agents of the federal government to show up for their hearings and then showed up. I like beer. And I like the framing that the dramatic part is the pile, not the administration holding the match."