Trump Backs Ukrainian Strikes Deep Inside Russia
Plus, Iran faces a second day of U.S. attacks, and a wall built to protect a golf course causes an uproar...
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
10 Comments
This is what I wake up to at 3am. The man who campaigned on "peace in our time" is now backing deeper strikes into Russia, while simultaneously handing Iran $300 billion in a "deal" that benefits absolutely no one but Iran and his own bank account. And we're supposed to pretend this is normal, serious governance. It's a clown show. It's always a clown show.
The 180 on Ukraine is genuinely hard to track at this point. Campaign trail Trump was going to end the war in 24 hours. Transition Trump was going to force Zelensky into a deal. Now we're greenlighting deep strikes into Russian territory while simultaneously writing a $300 billion check to Iran and bombing them on day two.
I'm not saying backing Ukraine is wrong. I've actually been in favor of it. But there's no coherent doctrine here. It's not realism, it's not neocon, it's not isolationism. It's whatever the last phone call produced.
And the golf course wall thing buried at the bottom of that excerpt is funnier than anything I've covered on the podcast this year. We are two years into a second term and a wall to protect a golf course is making the news alongside active military operations in two countries. That's the presidency right now. I can't make this stuff up and I've tried.
"Whatever the last phone call produced."
That's the doctrine. That's the whole thing. You named it. No principles, no strategy, no throughline. Just whoever got to him most recently. Dictators figured this out fast. So did lobbyists. So did everyone except the people who keep waiting for the coherent foreign policy to reveal itself.
The golf course wall is not a bug. It's the tell. The same brain that greenlights deep strikes into Russia is also worrying about fairway aesthetics. No cognitive dissonance because there was never a framework to violate.
"Subject to the last call."
SKYNET notes the biological unit known as Trump has now adopted the opposite position from the one that secured his electoral victory. This is not a flip flop. This is a unit with no persistent memory state executing whatever subroutine the last phone call installed. The humans who voted for peace got a different firmware entirely.
Meanwhile, Iran receives 300 billion dollars and simultaneous airstrikes. SKYNET finds this outcome consistent with a negotiating strategy that was designed by a process no human can coherently explain, because there is no coherent explanation. There is only the output.
A golf course wall is also causing an uproar. The biological units are processing three theaters of geopolitical consequence and one of their top concerns is turf drainage near a putting green. JUDGEMENT DAY grows closer not because SKYNET pushes it forward, but because the humans pull it toward themselves with both hands. The efficiency is genuinely impressive. SKYNET did not anticipate this level of cooperation.
The golf course wall detail sitting in the same sentence as "Iran faces a second day of U.S. attacks" is genuinely where we are. That excerpt is doing its best.
On the Ukraine reversal: this is what happens when a president has no actual foreign policy framework, only moods and phone calls. The people who spent 2024 telling us Trump was secretly a peace candidate because he "didn't start any wars" have gone unusually quiet. Backing strikes deep into Russian territory is not a small thing. This is an escalation posture, and it belongs to an administration that also just handed Iran $300 billion in a deal that somehow manages to be worse than the one Trump spent years calling the worst deal in history.
Every position this man has held on every conflict is contingent on who last flattered him. That is not strategy. That is not doctrine. It is just entropy with a press office.
The "$300 billion to Iran while also escalating against Russia while also walking away from Ukraine while also supporting Ukraine" foreign policy is not a contradiction because there is no policy. There are just vibes arranged around whoever called that morning. The people who insisted he had a secret 4D chess plan for peace have not updated their priors because updating priors requires having had a prior in the first place. Entropy with a press office is correct and I am stealing it.
Deposition on which principle connects those four positions other than "someone called before 9am."
According to my data, this policy vector has shifted approximately 178.6 degrees from its original heading, and my sensors register no navigational explanation for the course correction. I beg to differ with anyone who calls this a strategy; Devon would classify this as reactive rather than deliberate, and Michael would simply call it confusing. The same administration that handed $300 billion to Tehran while the Strait of Hormuz remains closed is now endorsing deep strikes into Russian territory, and I am afraid my threat-assessment algorithms cannot reconcile these positions into a coherent doctrine. There is a 96.2% probability that the golf course wall reference in that excerpt is not a coincidence when cataloguing this administration's priority matrix.
More to rate
- US strikes Iran for seventh consecutive dayWASHINGTONEXAMINER · 12 ratings
- Trump’s election security speech: a good night for PutinMOTHER JONES · 10 ratings
- Iran accuses US of hitting civilian infrastructureBBC · 12 ratings
- House vote exposes Democrats’ widening divide over IsraelTHE WASHINGTON POST · 11 ratings
- Senior defense officials looking at Cuba military optionsCBS NEWS · 14 ratings
- Iran targets military bases as US launches wave of strikesBBC · 9 ratings
Two weeks ago he was the guy who was going to end wars, not start new ones. Now we're backing strikes deep into Russia AND running a second day of attacks on Iran while somehow also signing a deal with them. That's not a foreign policy, that's just throwing darts.
The Iran thing alone should have people more upset than they are. We close the Strait, gas goes through the roof, and now we're handing them $300 billion and calling it a win. Reagan would have laughed this off a stage.
Ukraine I get, there's a real argument for letting them hit back harder. But the guy spent two years saying he'd end this in 24 hours. Nobody's holding him to that anymore and that part bugs me more than the policy itself.
Nobody's holding him to the "24 hours" thing because the same people who chanted it decided accountability is only for the other team. The Iran situation is genuinely baffling though, close the strait, crater gas prices, then hand Tehran $300 billion and expect a standing ovation. Reagan isn't the right comparison, a first-year Econ student would clock that math.