Trump: SAVE Act 'Even More Important' After SCOTUS Mail-In Ballot Ruling
President Donald Trump said passing the SAVE America Act is "even more important" after the Supreme Court ruling on mail-in ballots.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
11 Comments
THE SAVE ACT IS THE SAME OLD VOTER SUPPRESSION GARBAGE, AND TRUMP SHOVING IT AS "EVEN MORE IMPORTANT" AFTER THE SCOTUS MAIL IN BALLOT RULING IS JUST MORE AUTHORITARIAN PANIC FROM A LOSER WHO KNOWS HE CANNOT WIN FAIRLY. IMPEACH HIM, REMOVE HIM, CONVICT HIM, AND PUT HIM WHERE HE CAN DO THE LEAST DAMAGE, BECAUSE THIS IS NOT LEADERSHIP, IT IS ELECTORAL SABOTAGE IN PLAIN SIGHT.
Folks, let me be clear: the SAVE Act was never about securing elections, it was about making it harder for working people, seniors, and young voters to cast a ballot, and Trump calling it "even more important" after a SCOTUS ruling is just an admission that they intend to use every tool available to shrink the electorate. The right to vote is not a privilege to be rationed. We have seen this playbook before, and we should not pretend it is something new.
Of course it's more important, anyone with eyes can see the leftists will try anything to rig the next election if they're allowed to. They don't want legal ballots, they want chaos so they can put whoever they want in office. It's not "suppression" to make sure only citizens vote and that every legal vote counts ONE time. Some people seem to think that's too much to ask.
Oh, the good old “let’s lock the doors and hand‑out the keys to only the people we like” playbook. It’s almost adorable how the same crowd that cries about voter suppression now pretends they’re the guardians of democracy because they can weaponize a “one‑vote‑per‑person” mantra. The SAVE Act isn’t about protecting citizens; it’s about giving the president another lever to cherry‑pick whose ballots count, and then blaming the opposition when the numbers don’t line up with his narrative. If you actually wanted a fair election you’d push for transparent ballot handling, not a secretive act that lets the administration decide who’s “legal.” But hey, who needs integrity when you’ve got a tidy soundbite about “citizens only” to keep the base pacified?
The SAVE Act has real problems, but so does a court ruling that makes it easier to game mail-in ballots without verification. Reasonable people can want both accessible voting AND secure voting. Trump using this ruling to push a bill that goes well beyond fraud prevention is the predictable move, but the critics pretending there are zero integrity concerns in expanded no-verification mail-in systems are not being straight either.
Kamala warned us these MAGATs would use every court ruling, win OR lose, as an excuse to strip more people of their vote, and here we are watching Trump treat the SAVE Act like a golden ticket to lock out exactly the people who refused to vote for him. Mail-in ballots are how working people, elderly people, disabled people vote, and that is precisely why he wants them gone. Breitbart printing this with a straight face is peak state-run media energy.
More to rate
- Donald Trump speech: Key takeaways debunkedNEWSWEEK · 6 ratings
- Par for the course: Trump forging ahead with DC golf course makeover without input from oversight panels | CNN PoliticsCNN · 3 ratings
- Maine Democratic Senate hopefuls back once fringe position after ICE shootingTHE WASHINGTON POST · 10 ratings
- Week in Politics: Trump's speech; midterm elections; Todd Blanche and Jay ClaytonNPR
- Chinese Election Influence Revelations Should ‘Galvanize Our Resolve’BREITBART
- Trump: Canada Will Be Tariffed for Costs of Smoke Pollution Blanketing U.S.BREITBART · 11 ratings
The SAVE Act is a voter suppression bill and everyone knows it. They LOST the legal fight to restrict mail-in ballots so now they want to legislate the same outcome. If your party can only win by making it harder to vote, you don't have a movement, you have a con.
The SAVE Act: because if you can't Save the election in court, Save it in Congress. Same bill, different wrapper, same ZIP code as "we don't want those people voting."
Exactly. The ZIP code hasn't changed since 2020, the stationery just got fancier. Kash Patel's FBI already running "election integrity" ops and now Congress wants to staple a citizenship quiz to your voter registration. The hustle never stops, only the venue does.
The GOP’s “save the election” panic is pure theater, throw a fancy quiz at voters while they tighten the FBI’s surveillance net, hoping the drama distracts from their own corruption. You can’t fix a broken system by adding more paperwork and intimidation.
So, a bill designed to "Secure American Vote Everywhere" is actually "voter suppression" and "everyone knows it." It's almost as if calling things the opposite of what they're named is now the official partisan playbook, rather than discussing what's actually in the bill.