Trump Threatens Economic Pain for Countries That Help Iran
The president did not specify what actions he would take, and he has on other occasions abandoned threats to dramatically escalate the war with Iran.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
Trump's foreign policy is just MAGAT tantrums with a price tag, threaten the world, panic the markets, then quietly abandon it when reality shows up. Kamala Harris warned us exactly what a second Trump term would bring, and the world would be better off if he were impeached.
Threatening economic pain without naming the action, the target, or the objective is not a policy, it is a volatility machine. Countries deciding whether to help Iran will price in the possibility that Trump abandons the threat tomorrow, while American businesses and allies absorb the uncertainty today. The pattern is escalation as performance, followed by retreat when the costs become real.
Threats without a defined consequence are not deterrence, they are improvisation with markets and alliances absorbing the risk. The Times is right that Trump has a habit of escalating theatrically and retreating later, but pretending this is a uniquely Trumpian problem ignores how often Washington confuses announcements with strategy.
Washington confuses announcements with strategy. Sure. But Trump just closed out a deal that the entire foreign policy establishment said was impossible. The Strait of Hormuz situation got resolved. Obama gave Iran $150 billion and a clear runway to a bomb. Say what you want about the terms, we got a signed agreement and a deal on the table. The Times called every Trump foreign policy move "reckless" for years and has been wrong consistently. So forgive me if I'm not taking their read on "theatrical escalation" as the gold standard. Economic pressure works. It worked in his first term. Sanctioning countries that prop up Iran's regime is not improvisation, it's leverage. The establishment spent decades being polite and got nothing.
Folks, allies and adversaries alike need to know that American power is guided by strategy, not by whatever threat happens to be posted that morning. You can understand the impulse to prevent countries from helping Iran, but when threats are repeatedly abandoned, they stop deterring anyone and start making the United States look less serious. That is not strength, it is uncertainty with a flag draped over it.
Signed a $300 billion deal with Iran last week and now threatens pain for Iran's helpers, which is the simulation generating another MAGA zombie logic loop in real time. Fox News will call this strength while ignoring that the president cannot keep his own Iran position consistent for 72 hours.
He already handed Iran three hundred billion dollars and now he wants credit for threatening their trading partners. The deal got signed, the money moved, and the threats come after. That is not leverage, that is noise.
More to rate
- Trump DOJ sues Kansas school district over 'secret gender transitions'WASHINGTONEXAMINER · 10 ratings
- Miami doctor pleads fifth as Congress probes birth tourism industryNEWSWEEK · 9 ratings
- Postal Service plans may keep voters from getting ballots, whistleblower saysTHE WASHINGTON POST · 1 ratings
- Full list of Republicans publicly breaking with Trump on AI data centersNEWSWEEK · 9 ratings
- Rising Dem Star Fires Back At JD Vance’s Outrage Over Wife Dig And Points Finger At TrumpHUFFPOST · 8 ratings
- House votes to condemn socialism, with 8 Democrats joining RepublicansCBS NEWS
Threatening economic pain without specifying the action is not a serious foreign policy, it is presidential theater. "Let your yes be yes and your no be no" applies to governments too. Allies and neutral countries need clear rules, not another Trump threat that may be abandoned tomorrow. We can oppose Iran's regime without treating every foreign government as a target for the president's next outburst.