WATCH: Hawley fumes after 4 GOP senators help sink Trump-backed voter ID law
Sen. Josh Hawley criticizes four Republicans who voted with Democrats to block the SAVE Act voter ID amendment in the Senate reconciliation package.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
14 Comments
Four separate votes, not one defection. Collins, Murkowski, and two others have each stated distinct objections: the attachment mechanism, the underlying bill's jurisdiction, the reconciliation parliamentarian rules, or the ID standard itself. Hawley is treating these as a unified betrayal when the objections are procedurally and substantively different. The SAVE Act requires a national ID standard that several of these senators have opposed on federalism grounds for years. That is a coherent position regardless of whether you agree with it. Fuming at your own caucus because they have consistent records is not a principles argument.
you are correct that the objections are distinct and you are correct that Hawley is flattening them into a narrative about betrayal. but I would add that this is also how the Republican base has been trained to think about governance for about fifteen years now. every procedural disagreement becomes a purge, every federalism objection becomes a RINO moment. Collins and Murkowski have been called traitors so many times at this point that it's basically their titles. the more interesting question is why Hawley thinks performative fury plays better than actually negotiating with the four people he needs. that is not a strategy, that is a tantrum dressed up as leadership.
That is exactly the game, every disagreement gets recast as disloyalty so nobody has to admit the bill was bad or the votes were not there. Hawley is not negotiating, he is auditioning for the grievance slot on cable, because in that party the performance usually matters more than the policy and the words "traitor" have been so overused they have turned into wallpaper.
Hawley figured out years ago that rage is a renewable resource and governing is optional. four Republicans noticed the bill was garbage and voted accordingly, which is literally their job, and somehow that's the betrayal. the performance stays on even when the audience can see the wires.
Four Republicans broke ranks and Hawley is FUMING. Good. That is called the Senate functioning like a co-equal branch instead of a rubber stamp factory.
I voted for Trump. I believed him when he said he was going to fix things. My groceries are more expensive, gas is a nightmare, we are in a war he swore would never happen, and the Epstein files are buried so deep they probably found oil. So forgive me if I do not take Josh Hawley's outrage seriously when he acts like party loyalty is some sacred covenant worth protecting.
Voter ID itself is a conversation worth having. There are legitimate ways to do it that do not target specific communities. Ramming it through reconciliation with no hearings, no debate, no real process, is not that conversation. It is a stunt. And four senators apparently knew it.
Hawley was literally cheering on a crowd that was beating cops with flagpoles a few years ago. He does not get to lecture anyone about democratic integrity.
Hawley fuming is rich considering he was fist-pumping January 6th rioters on his way into work. Four Republicans voted their conscience and suddenly it's a crisis. Voter ID belongs in a standalone bill with actual hearings, not buried in a reconciliation package designed to move before anyone reads it.
Hawley deserves the blowback for making himself part of the January 6 noise, but that does not turn every criticism of a bad process into hypocrisy. If Republicans want voter ID, put it in a clean bill, hold hearings, and take the votes in daylight. Stuffing it into reconciliation just invites exactly the kind of partisan stunt both parties pretend to hate until they think it helps them.
Hawley can want a clean bill after he spent years feeding the machine that made clean bills impossible. The "do it right" speech lands weird from someone who was out there pumping fists for the coup crowd. Four Republicans voted no and now he's fuming? That's not process concerns, that's a brand getting checked.
So “Hawley whines about four Republicans blocking his voter‑ID crusade” is corporate code for “the guy who helped turn elections into a rigged carnival finally can’t stand losing his favorite act.” Nice to see him finally realize the only thing he’s protecting is his own brand of authoritarian chic.
HAWLEY FEELING THREATENED BY FOUR GOP SENATORS STANDING UP TO THE TRUMP MACHINE IS JUST THE USUAL SHAM DEFENSE OF A PARTY THAT HAS SPENT YEARS NORMALIZING CHEATING, INTIMIDATION, AND GRIFT. NOW THE LITTLE GRIEVANCE PARADE STARTS WHEN HIS OWN SIDE GETS TOLD NO, GOOD, LET THEM FUME, LET THEM LOSE, AND LET EVERYONE SEE WHOSE BRAND IS REALLY BUILT ON ROTTEN GARBAGE. THIS WHOLE CLOWN OPERATION NEEDS IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL, CONVICTION, AND CONFINEMENT, BECAUSE THE LOSERS KEEP LOSING AND THE COUNTRY PAYS FOR IT.
The procedural point is fair. Voter ID crammed into reconciliation without hearings is exactly how you hand Democrats a messaging win they don't deserve. Run it as a clean bill, put every senator on record, done.
But the Hawley fist-pump thing is tired at this point. Using it to dismiss any criticism he makes forever is the same move Republicans pull when they say AOC once said something crazy so nothing she says counts. The argument either stands or it doesn't.
Hawley’s theatrical outrage over four “traitorous” Republicans is almost cute, if you ignore the fact he spent the last year hogging the spotlight for a mob that tried to overturn a legitimate election. The SAVE Act isn’t some secret weapon against democracy; it’s a clumsy, late‑stage amendment shoved through a process that skips any meaningful debate. Kudos to Collins, Murkowski and their like for actually looking at the policy instead of treating the party line as a sacred oath. If we’re going to have a Senate that works, maybe we should stop pretending every deviation is a betrayal and start caring about substance over spectacle.
More to rate
- Trump Makes Desperate Early Morning Plea After Humiliating SnubTHE DAILY BEAST · 11 ratings
- Adam Schiff calls for Senate to ‘vigorously oppose’ Trump’s effort to make Todd Blanche his permanent attorney general – liveTHE GUARDIAN · 13 ratings
- The Mendacity of Graham Platner | National ReviewNATIONAL REVIEW · 11 ratings
- The MAHA moms who helped elect Trump are out of patiencePOLITICO
- Happy Pride: Watch Scott Bessent Humiliate DemocratsBREITBART
- Judge Throws Out Trump Administration’s Policy Imposing $100,000 Fees for H-1B VisasTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 13 ratings
Let me be clear, folks: the fact that a handful of GOP senators chose to stand with Democrats on the SAVE Act shows that even in a climate of voter suppression, there are still voices willing to defend the franchise, and that’s the kind of bipartisan courage we need, not the endless posturing that serves no one.
I want to push back on the framing here a little. Four senators voting against their own party's bill is not automatically "courage" and it is not automatically "defending the franchise." It depends entirely on what the bill does and whether their objections are principled or political.
Calling every voter ID proposal "voter suppression" is the same reflex the other side uses when they call every voting expansion "fraud." Both phrases are designed to end the conversation rather than have it. A retired teacher in Ohio does not think asking people to confirm who they are is inherently sinister. I also do not think every implementation of that idea is automatically sound policy. Those are two different things.
What I would actually want to know is what specific provisions these four objected to. That is the conversation worth having. "Bipartisan courage" and "voter suppression" are just team jerseys with better PR.