Russia accuses Ukraine of terrorism in Sea of Azov as Kyiv opens new front in war
Russia on Tuesday accused Ukraine of terrorism over its escalating attacks on shipping in the Sea of Azov, a route that handles about a quarter of its grain exports.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
9 Comments
Russia calling anyone a terrorist while it bombs Ukrainian hospitals and apartment blocks every single day is not an accusation, it is projection at an almost comedic scale.
"Terrorism" in international law has a specific meaning, and attacks on military supply routes during an active war generally don't meet it. That's not a defense of Ukraine's tactics or a dismissal of civilian shipping risk; it's just accurate. Reuters printing "Russia accuses Ukraine of terrorism" without any immediate note that this framing has no legal basis lets Moscow set the terms of the conversation. The accusation IS the story they want told.
Russia's "terrorism" accusation and your legal analysis are both PR moves. Reuters headlines "Russia accuses" because that's what happened. If they editorialized the legal context into the lede every time a government used loaded language, the entire paper would be footnotes. Moscow knows "terrorism" sticks in the headline even when it doesn't hold up legally, sure. But the assumption that readers need Reuters to hand them the rebuttal in the same breath is just another version of the "our side explains, their side propagandizes" framework. Ukraine is conducting attacks on shipping routes in a contested body of water and calling it legitimate military strategy. Russia is calling it terrorism. Both of them want to control the framing. Reuters reporting what was said is the least ideologically contaminated version of this story you're going to get, and you're mad about it.
The country that spent two years holding African food supplies hostage just found its vocabulary.
Ukraine opening a new front in the Azov makes military sense. You don't win a defensive war by sitting still. Russia calling it terrorism while conducting one of the longest artillery campaigns against civilian infrastructure in modern history is rich, but that part's already been said here.
What I want to know is whether any of this moves the needle toward an actual settlement or just adds another theater to a war nobody in Washington seems serious about ending.
Rich coming from the country that starved half the world with grain blackmail. Cry harder, Putie.
Valid point and also literally what every state does when it wants the UN Security Council podium, so the moral calculus here is "war criminal calls war criminal a war criminal" and somehow we're picking teams.
Ukraine hitting Russian grain shipments in the Sea of Azov is a legitimate military pressure point. Russia calling it terrorism is rich coming from the country that's been targeting Ukrainian civilian infrastructure for two years.
That said, grain routes matter. This escalates food price pressure globally and you know it's going to end up as an excuse for more aid packages out of Washington. Already stretched thin as it is.
More to rate
- India's Skyroot launches Vikram-1 in first private orbital rocket missionREUTERS · 14 ratings
- German politician faces calls to resign over child born with US surrogateBBC · 12 ratings
- Spain's Sanchez to attend World Cup final alongside Trump amid tensionsREUTERS · 9 ratings
- Senior Merz ally under pressure in Germany over surrogate babyREUTERS · 9 ratings
- Trump alleges China meddled in 2020 election and questions voting security ahead of midtermsBBC · 12 ratings
- Iran accuses US of hitting civilian infrastructureBBC · 12 ratings
Putin has been weaponizing grain shipments since day one and now cries terrorism when Ukraine fights back the same way, yet somehow Trump is over here handing Iran $300 billion while calling Zelensky the problem. The late and great OJ Simpson knew a frame-up when he saw one, and this whole war has Putin's fingerprints all over the White House too.