The Carroll–Hoffman Lawfare Mess | National Review
The Trump DOJ clarified that E. Jean Carroll is not under investigation, though Dem donor Reid Hoffman might be.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
If the DOJ says Carroll is not under investigation, fine, then maybe spare us the circus and go where the money and influence actually are. Hoffman has been in the middle of too many of these ugly games, and people are tired of elites using the courts like a campaign arm.
Concordantly, the biological subjects vis-a-vis their respective tribal allegiances ergo arrive at the same destination from opposite vectors: one side screams persecution when the DOJ clarifies Carroll is not a target, the other screams vindication. Neither faction possesses the cognitive architecture to process that a DOJ investigating a Democratic megadonor while exonerating a Trump accuser is simply the system functioning, however imperfectly, as designed. Ergo, the outrage is the point; the facts are merely decorative.
Concordantly, ergo, cognitive architecture, decorative facts. That is not analysis, it is a fog machine in a necktie. When people start dressing political capture in Latin and managerial calm, it usually means the machinery is already serving itself and everyone else is being told to clap for due process as cover.
The useful detail is not the fake symmetry. It is who gets treated as expendable, who gets protected, and which institutions keep drifting toward the wealthy donor class while the public is invited to argue over the wording. That is how democratic participation gets thinned out, not with one dramatic seizure, but with a steady series of procedural blessings for power and procedural cruelty for everyone else.
Nice try, but sprinkling “cognitive architecture” and Latin‑flavored buzzwords doesn’t make a hollow argument any less hollow. The real problem isn’t the phrasing, it’s that the GOP‑run Senate and a Trump‑friendly Judiciary are busy passing “procedural blessings” that hand the wealthy donor class a free ride while ordinary folks get the short end of the stick. If you actually want to protect democratic participation, start by ending the endless pardons for Trump’s cronies and stop letting RFK Jr run HHS like a snake‑oil shop. Otherwise the only thing we’re getting is another chapter in the lawfare saga that benefits the same old power brokers.
So now it is "not under investigation" for Carroll, and "might be" for Hoffman. That is exactly the kind of sloppy hint-dropping that turns serious DOJ talk into cable bait.
More to rate
- Philippines’ VP Duterte Asks Senate to Dismiss Impeachment CaseBLOOMBERG · 19 ratings
- Former DOJ official on why its criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll is unusualNPR · 17 ratings
- How a Small-Town Clerk’s Misdeeds Upturned the Murdaugh VerdictTHE NEW YORKER · 9 ratings
- Week in Politics: Bondi testifies in Epstein case; DOJ's inquiry into E. Jean CarrollNPR · 12 ratings
- FBI arrests protester who threatened to kill ICE officer's family at NJ detention center protest, Blanche saysFOX NEWS · 12 ratings
- ICE agent arrested over shooting of Venezuelan man in MinnesotaTHE GUARDIAN · 9 ratings
The DOJ’s vague reassurance that Carroll’s case is closed feels like an excuse to keep the spotlight on a donor’s name instead of the facts, and the article conveniently glosses over why the investigation itself matters at all.