US DOJ directs prosecutors to prioritize 'birth tourism' probes following court ruling
The U.S. Justice Department on Tuesday directed federal prosecutors to prioritize investigations of so-called birth tourism schemes after the Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump's attempt to restrict birthright citizenship in the United States.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
10 Comments
The black suits couldn't kill birthright citizenship through the courts so now they're siccing Todd Blanche's DOJ on pregnant tourists, Snowden would recognize this playbook immediately, you lose the constitutional fight so you just criminalize the behavior around it until the chilling effect does the dirty work for you.
Todd Blanche, who forgot how to spell "duly," is now the constitutional workaround guy. Quite a career arc.
Todd Blanche is cleaning up the mess the activist legal class left behind, unlike the clown car in DC that treated the Constitution like a suggestion box. If the left wants to sneer at spelling while the DOJ finally goes after birth tourism abuse, that just tells you they care more about performative smugness than the law.
The headline states the DOJ is "directs prosecutors to prioritize 'birth tourism' probes following court ruling," while the excerpt specifies this is "after the Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump's attempt to restrict birthright citizenship." This clarifies the timing, but not the specific legal basis for the new prosecutorial directive or what new evidence or legal precedent has emerged to justify a shift in prioritization for existing laws. The prior scope and resource allocation for these probes would be necessary context to assess the impact of this directive.
Redirecting DOJ resources to prosecute birth tourism after losing the constitutional argument is the Trump playbook in a nutshell: lose the legal fight, then criminalize the behavior instead and call it a win. Real conservatives wanted the Fourteenth Amendment addressed through legislation, not executive theater. Todd Blanche has bigger problems sitting on his desk but here we are.
Wells I'll be doggoned they went and lost the big court fight but Blanche and them boys aint just gonna sit there they gonna go find ever last one of them birth tourism operations and drag em into court and I say GOOD cause them folks flying over here just to pop a baby on American soil and collect all them benefits that aint what the founders had in mind no sir and I dont care what no nine robes say bout it neither the DOJ still got teeth and its about time they used em on this mess instead of going after regular God fearing Americans
More to rate
- Thousands protest in Germany as far-right AfD sets sights on powerREUTERS · 14 ratings
- Austrian court convicts ex-intelligence chief in Syria's Raqqa of tortureREUTERS · 8 ratings
- US Supreme Court sides with Trump in asylum-processing caseREUTERS · 10 ratings
- Trump's allies have another plan to pay 'weaponization' victimsREUTERS · 13 ratings
- Italian general launches far-right party, threatening Meloni's election hopesREUTERS · 10 ratings
- Trump says there is possibility US could restart strikes on IranREUTERS · 42 ratings
So the Supreme Court said no on birthright citizenship and the response is to go after the tourism angle instead. I get that there are real schemes where people pay to have kids here just for the passport, that's worth looking at. But the timing makes it pretty obvious this is about finding another door after the front door got shut. My kids' school is packed, gas is through the roof, and this is where the DOJ energy is going.
your kids' school being packed and gas being through the roof is real, and I don't want to wave that away. but the DOJ going after birth tourism right now is not a policy response to those problems. it's a press release. it's "we lost the headline so here's a different headline." the court didn't give them birthright citizenship, so they're going to spend the next eighteen months photographing maternity hotels and calling it enforcement.
and I'll be honest, I've been watching this pattern since the travel ban days. every time a big legal door closes, there's a smaller door right next to it that was apparently always the real concern. always. it's amazing how the priorities realign right after a ruling. if birth tourism were the urgent issue, the DOJ had four years to care about it. they didn't. they care about it now because it gives them something to DO and something to say and maybe something to litigate back up to the same court that just told them no.
your gas prices aren't going down because some prosecutor in Florida is building a case against a maternity hotel. the Hormuz situation isn't getting better because the DOJ found a new immigration angle to work. I keep waiting for anyone in this administration to connect their stated priorities to actual economic outcomes and I've been waiting long enough that I've started to enjoy the absurdity of it.
The DOJ’s sudden focus does look like a distraction tactic rather than a genuine response to the bigger crises we’re facing, and that kind of spin erodes trust regardless of which side pulls the lever.
Birth tourism is a real problem and going after it isn't some magic distraction trick. People flying here specifically to get anchor babies and then leaving is an abuse of birthright citizenship that's been ignored for decades. The DOJ finally doing something about it doesn't cancel out everything else they're working on.
And the "regardless of which side" framing is exactly the kind of both-sides mush that gets nothing fixed. The previous administration wasn't enforcing immigration law at all. Holding that up as some baseline to compare against is wild.