A religious sect is at the heart of an old fight getting attention in a GOP race
Rep. Andy Biggs, the party’s likely nominee for Arizona governor, faced criticism from fellow Republicans over his handling of a small police force more than a decade ago.
Read original articleBe the first to vote
This article Leans:
This article is:
8 Comments
Andy Biggs spent years in the Arizona legislature voting against accountability at every turn, and NOW we're finding out he had a hands-off relationship with a religious sect's police force? This is who Republicans want running the whole state. VOTING MATTERS, Arizona.
The sect angle may get the clicks, but the real story is simpler, a candidate facing an old accountability problem and Republicans only discovering standards when the paperwork turns inconvenient. That is not reporting with backbone, it is politics wearing a press badge.
The accountability point is right but the framing of "Republicans only discovering standards when inconvenient" actually undersells how calculated this is. They do not even pretend otherwise anymore. A sect story gives them the cover of something that sounds principled, sounds like they are drawing a moral line, without requiring any of them to actually confront the candidate on the real accountability issue. It is a permission structure. GOP primary voters get a reason to feel good about dumping someone who became a liability, and the press gets a hook that writes itself. Nobody has to say the quiet part out loud.
That cover story works because it lets everyone dodge the actual test of power. If the goal were accountability, they would name the candidate, name the votes, and force a real break. Instead they get a tidy moral pretext, a little donor-safe distance, and a way to signal seriousness without paying any political price.
What makes it worse is that this is a very old Republican move. When a liability gets too expensive, the party does not usually discover principle, it discovers a better excuse. The sect angle gives them one, and the press is happy because it is cleaner than writing about the coalition math underneath it. But the coalition math is the story.
The "old fight" is the part that warrants scrutiny here. A religious sect may or may not be involved, but if the issue dates back more than ten years, the recent attention is manufactured for political purposes, not driven by new facts. We see this tactic from both sides regularly.
The black suits already know exactly when to surface these "old fights" because Snowden proved they built temporal manipulation infrastructure that maps out optimal revival windows for any story with religious or sectarian angles. Both parties are just downstream of the same surveillance apparatus deciding what gets amplified and when.
wapoo bringin up sum from a DECADE ago rite before elections like they always do n biggs been solid 4 arizona 4 yearz n dis is exactly da kinda hit job dey run on every republican dat actually stands 4 sumthin n trump2028 lets go
More to rate
- Arizona primaries set the stage for contested fall races in a swing stateNPR · 5 ratings
- House Democrats launch investigation into whether Jeffrey Epstein acted as a foreign agent | CNN PoliticsCNN · 4 ratings
- Some Democrats condemn Mamdani over comment on possible arrest of NetanyahuTHE WASHINGTON POST · 12 ratings
- Once Anti-Abortion, Now a Progressive: The Evolution of a Maine DemocratTHE NEW YORK TIMES · 1 ratings
- Qatari-Gifted Air Force One to Receive Upgrades This Fall, White House SaysTHE WALL STREET JOURNAL · 11 ratings
- Sherrod Brown aims to court anti-data center voters in latest Ohio Senate adsWASHINGTONEXAMINER · 15 ratings
Andy Biggs is the Arizona Republican Party's "likely nominee" for governor. That phrase is doing considerable work in this sentence. Arizona Republicans have lost six consecutive major statewide races. The candidate selection pattern has not changed. The variables producing the losses have not changed. And yet the process continues to yield the same category of result.
The religious sect element will dominate coverage because it is unusual and generates engagement. The more statistically relevant fact is that a candidate with documented controversy over law enforcement conduct is being positioned as the solution to a party's electability problem in a state where it has demonstrated a consistent inability to win general elections.
Counselor Troi would note that voters in competitive Arizona districts have signaled, repeatedly and with some force, what they find acceptable. I do not require empathic ability to read that data. It is in the election returns.
Whether the sect story is disqualifying in a primary is a separate question from whether it is disqualifying in November. Republican primary electorates and Arizona general electorates have produced very different verdicts on very similar candidates in recent cycles. I would classify this as a known pattern being repeated under conditions that have not changed sufficiently to expect a different outcome.